Skip to content
1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volume 74, Issue 7

sp. nov. isolated from fermented cabbage, and proposal of Gundawar . 2019 and Mechichi . 1999 as heterotypic synonyms of (Parshina . 2003) Haas and Blanchard 2020 and (McClung and McCoy 1957) Haas and Blanchard 2020, respectively Open Access

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, endospore-forming, rod-shaped, indole-producing bacterial strain, designated YZC6, was isolated from fermented cabbage. Strain YZC6 grew at 10–37  °C, pH 5.5–8.5, and with up to 2  % (w/v) NaCl. The major cellular fatty acids were C and C 11 dimethyl acetal. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene revealed that strain YZC6 belonged to the genus and was closely related to DSM 5434 (98.3  % sequence similarity), WM1 (98.1  %), and SPL73 (98.1  %). The average nucleotide identity based on (below 87.8  %) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (below 36.1 %) values between the novel isolate and its corresponding relatives showed that strain YZC6 could be readily distinguished from its closely related species. Based on genotypic, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic data, a novel species, sp. nov., was proposed, with YZC6 as the type strain (=MAFF 212518=JCM 32810=DSM 112100). This study also proposed Gundawar . 2019 as a later heterotypic synonym of (Parshina . 2003) Haas and Blanchard 2020 and Mechichi . 1999 as a later heterotypic synonym of (McClung and McCpy 1957) Haas and Blanchard 2020.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Bacillota , fermented cabbage and Lacrimispora brassicae sp. nov.
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Genebank project (Microorganism Section)
    • Principle Award Recipient: MasanoriTohno
  • NARO NIP project
    • Principle Award Recipient: MasanoriTohno
  • JSPS KAKENHI (Award JP21K14967)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
© 2024 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006456
2024-07-17
2025-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/74/7/ijsem006456.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006456&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Haas KN, Blanchard JL. Reclassification of the Clostridium clostridioforme and Clostridium sphenoides clades as Enterocloster gen. nov. and Lacrimispora gen. nov., including reclassification of 15 taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:23–34 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouvet P, K’Ouas G, Le Coustumier A, Popoff MR. Clostridium celerecrescens, often misidentified as “Clostridium clostridioforme group,” is involved in rare human infection cases. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 74:299–302 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ryskova L, Zahradnicek J, Kukla R, Bolehovska R, Vajda M et al. Dual infection of an open fracture caused by Mycobacterium setense and Clostridium celerecrescens. Antibiotics 2022; 11:1254 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Kwong TC, Chau ECT, Mak MCH, Choy CT, Chan LT et al. Characterization of the gut microbiome in healthy dogs and dogs with diabetes mellitus. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:2479 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Rainey FA, Hollen BJ, Small A. Genus I Clostridium. In De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd. edn New York: Springer; 2009 pp 738–828
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Z, Zhao W, Ma Y, Liang H, Wang D et al. Shifts in the bacterial community related to quality properties of vacuum-packaged peeled potatoes during storage. Foods 2022; 11:1147 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Tohno M, Kobayashi H, Nomura M, Kitahara M, Ohkuma M et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Italian ryegrass silage. Anim Sci J 2012; 83:111–120 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Atlas RM, Atlas RM. Handbook of Microbiological media, 3rd. edn Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press LLC; 2004 pp 1444–1445 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Madeira F, Pearce M, Tivey ARN, Basutkar P, Lee J et al. Search and sequence analysis tools services from EMBL-EBI in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:W276–W279 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Souvorov A, Agarwala R, Lipman DJ. SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol 2018; 19:153 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Perrin A, Rocha EPC. PanACoTA: a modular tool for massive microbial comparative genomics. NAR Genom Bioinform 2021; 3:lqaa106 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu D, Zhang Y, Fan G, Sun D, Zhang X et al. IPGA: a handy integrated prokaryotes genome and pan-genome analysis web service. Imeta 2022; 1:e55 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cumsille A, Durán RE, Rodríguez-Delherbe A, Saona-Urmeneta V, Cámara B et al. GenoVi, an open-source automated circular genome visualizer for bacteria and archaea. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1010998 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 2016; 428:726–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kanehisa M, Sato Y. KEGG mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci 2020; 29:28–35 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M. KEGG mapping tools for uncovering hidden features in biological data. Protein Sci 2022; 31:47–53 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structuresand visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W46–W50 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Cosentino S, Voldby Larsen M, Møller Aarestrup F, Lund O. PathogenFinder--distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS One 2013; 8:e77302 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:3491–3500 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Tohno M, Kitahara M, Uegaki R, Irisawa T, Ohkuma M et al. Lactobacillus hokkaidonensis sp. nov., isolated from subarctic timothy grass (Phleum pratense L.) silage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2526–2531 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sakamoto M, Suzuki M, Umeda M, Ishikawa I, Benno Y. Reclassification of Bacteroides forsythus (Tanner et al. 1986) as Tannerella forsythensis corrig., gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:841–849 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gundawar K, Kumari S, Sharma S, Grover V, Patil PB et al. Clostridium indicum sp. nov., a novel anaerobic bacterium isolated from the sludge of an industrial effluent. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:672–678 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:316–324 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kobayashi H, Tanizawa Y, Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M, Tohno M. Taxonomic status of the species Clostridium methoxybenzovorans Mechichi et al. 1999. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004951 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Urvashi Gundawar K, Sharma S, Choksket S, Sharma M et al. Lacrimispora defluvii PI-S10-B5AT sp. nov., an obligate anaerobe, isolated from an industrial waste and reclassification of Hungatella xylanolytica as Lacrimispora xylanolytica and Clostridium indicum as Lacrimispora indica comb. nov. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79:397 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hutchings MI, Truman AW, Wilkinson B. Antibiotics: past, present and future. Curr Opin Microbiol 2019; 51:72–80 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod 2020; 83:770–803 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams P, Hill P, Bonev B, Chan WC. Quorum-sensing, intra- and inter-species competition in the staphylococci. Microbiology 2023; 169:001381 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen Y, Yang Y, Ji X, Zhao R, Li G et al. The SCIFF-derived ranthipeptides participate in quorum sensing in solventogenic Clostridia. Biotechnol J 2020; 15:e2000136 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Blekkenhorst LC, Prince RL, Ward NC, Croft KD, Lewis JR et al. Development of a reference database for assessing dietary nitrate in vegetables. Mol Nutr Food Res 2017; 61:1600982 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006456
Loading
Lacrimispora brassicae sp. nov. isolated from fermented cabbage, and proposal of Clostridium indicum Gundawar et al. 2019 and Clostridium methoxybenzovorans Mechichi et al. 1999 as heterotypic synonyms of Lacrimispora amygdalina (Parshina et al. 2003) Haas and Blanchard 2020 and Lacrimispora indolis (McClung and McCoy 1957) Haas and Blanchard 2020, respectively
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 74, 006456 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006456
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006456
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006456
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error